Студопедия

КАТЕГОРИИ:

АвтоАвтоматизацияАрхитектураАстрономияАудитБиологияБухгалтерияВоенное делоГенетикаГеографияГеологияГосударствоДомЖурналистика и СМИИзобретательствоИностранные языкиИнформатикаИскусствоИсторияКомпьютерыКулинарияКультураЛексикологияЛитератураЛогикаМаркетингМатематикаМашиностроениеМедицинаМенеджментМеталлы и СваркаМеханикаМузыкаНаселениеОбразованиеОхрана безопасности жизниОхрана ТрудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПриборостроениеПрограммированиеПроизводствоПромышленностьПсихологияРадиоРегилияСвязьСоциологияСпортСтандартизацияСтроительствоТехнологииТорговляТуризмФизикаФизиологияФилософияФинансыХимияХозяйствоЦеннообразованиеЧерчениеЭкологияЭконометрикаЭкономикаЭлектроникаЮриспунденкция

Explain distinction between the manuscript and the review article. Show the basic structure of research article.




The review article is one of the most common genres of social journalism.

A review article is a material that represents a spectrum of opinions or stories on the same topic. The review article can be written, for example, about the popularity of bowling, about the adoption of a new criminal-precessive code, about the fight against drug addiction, or about something else (almost everything). The author of the review article should talk with several experts in the area of ​​interest. These experts should not always be scientists and officials (that is, people who professionally deal with the problem of interest to the journalist), but also those who are affected by the topic of the review article. From the point of view of a journalist, an expert on the criminal procedure code is not only a lawyer, but also a person who is imprisoned because of imperfect legislation. The main task of the author of the review article is to present really different views, and not of the notorious marginals, but of people who represent the point of view of a certain part of society.

The purpose of the article is tactful, but at the same time it is capacious and intelligible to convey all the necessary information. Comparative analysis is also useful here, and statistical data is all that will give "food" for reflection and decision-making.

Recognition of the review article, information should be submitted in a structured, laconic syllable. Successful will be the creation of numbered or bulleted lists.

It is important to provide the reader with examples and illustrations, in the role of which images and photographs, comparative tables, graphs or diagrams can appear. With their help, your article will be easy to comprehend.

Then most often the main characteristics of the product or service. We also take into account that purely technical information is always useful, but it is not worth it to get involved. Imagine mentally your audience, try to explain to her the essence of the matter in plain language.

We pay attention to the advantages of the offered goods (services) and shortcomings. But at the same time we give estimates: according to reviews, characteristics.

Naturally, the most competent and complete information will be collected if you really tested the subject of your review. Of course, in this case we are talking about a rather subjective opinion, but it is important to be tactful and authoritarian in expressing this opinion.

The reader should not get the impression that you are forcing him to something or discouraging. Any potential user of the service or product can be based on your decision to add up your opinion and make a decision.

Despite the fact that reviews are written for people, your article should be relevant to users' queries in search engines: so it will be easier for readers to find information. Do not forget to specify and where you can buy the goods or order the service, without specificity, in common words.

A scientific article is a complete author's work describing the results of an original scientific research (primary scientific article) or devoted to reviewing previously published scientific articles linked by a common theme (a review scientific article). In primary scientific articles, the authors state significant information about the research conducted in a form that allows other members of the scientific community to evaluate the research, reproduce the experiments, and also to evaluate the reasoning and conclusions drawn from them. Review scientific articles are designed to generalize, analyze, evaluate, summarize or synthesize previously published information (primary scientific publications). Quite often, a scientific article combines these two types of scientific texts, including the overview and original parts.

 

Give an assessment to work of the International scientific and technological center in RK.

The International Science and Technology Center (ISTC) is an intergovernmental organization connecting scientists from Kazakhstan, Armenia, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Georgia with their peers and research organizations in the EU, Japan, Republic of Korea, Norway and the United States.

ISTC facilitates international science projects and assists the global scientific and business community to source and engage with CIS and Georgian institutes that develop or possess an excellence of scientific know-how.

The International Science and Technology Center (ISTC) was established in Moscow by international agreement in November 1992 as a nonproliferation program. ISTC coordinates the efforts of numerous governments, international organizations, and private sector industries, providing former weapons scientists (FWS) from the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and Georgia with new opportunities for sustainable, peaceful employment. The current Parties to ISTC are the United States, the European Union, Japan, Norway and South Korea (funding Parties), as well as Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan. ISTC activities fall in two broad categories: research projects, which employ FWS in the development of new science and technology (S&T), and Supplemental Programs, which include workshops and other events to integrate FWS in the global S&T and industrial communities; training. In the 20 years ISTC has been active over 70,000 former weapons scientists in more than 760 research institutes spread across CIS and Georgia have been engaged in ISTC projects and activities.

Mission

· Contribute to solving national and global technological problems;

· Support basic and applied research;

· Support the transition to market-based economies;

· Encourage the integration of CIS and Georgian former weapons scientists into the international scientific community.

Activities and Operations (as of December 2015)

· 2,832 funded proposals, totaling $886,792,946

· Over 76,000 scientists from the CIS have recieved grants from ISTC

· $547.8M paid in research grants in total

· The center publishes Annual Reports

· In 2015, 26 projects in total were funded by ISTC Parties and partners

· Full range of supporting programs: Travel support (Mobility); Responsible Science; Science Workshops and Seminars; Patenting Support Programms; Japan Workshops; Probiotic & Health TI, Promotion of Innovative Environments

Support to Nonproliferation Regimes

· Disposal of Weapons-Grade Plutonium

· Destruction of Chemical Weapons

· Support to Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty

· Nuclear Material Control & Accounting

 

 










Последнее изменение этой страницы: 2018-04-12; просмотров: 264.

stydopedya.ru не претендует на авторское право материалов, которые вылажены, но предоставляет бесплатный доступ к ним. В случае нарушения авторского права или персональных данных напишите сюда...