Прочитайте текст и отметьте, истинны или ложны (True or False) данные утверждения, согласно тексту. Исправьте ложные утверждения.

1) The economic theory of mercantilism appeared in the 19^th century.

The economic theory of mercantilism appeared in the 16^th and the 18^th century.

2) The mercantilists agreed that a “favorable balance of trade” was the source of a nation’s wealth.

3) Major European powers acquired colonies to get markets for their manufactured goods.

4) British colonies could sell raw materials to all European countries.

British colonies could not sell raw materials to all European countries.

5) The ideas of the mercantilists were forgotten long ago.

The ideas of the mercantilists were not forgotten, the argument between

The Physiocrats and mercantilists is still with us.

6)  The physiocrats supported the idea that nations should protect business and industry.

 The physiocrats didn't support the idea that nations should protect business and industry.

7) The ideas of the physiocrats were expressed in the slogan “laissez faire”.

Дополните выражения из текста предлогами.

1) compete ___with_____ one another _____for___ profit

2) supply _____of___ gold or silver

3) resentment ____towards____ the Navigation Acts

4) go ___out_____ ____of_____ their way

5) keep its hands ___off_____ business

6)find the solution _____in____

Составьте фразы из слов в колонках A и B.

A. 1) manufactured с                B. a. costs

2) raw   e                               b. intervention

3) restrict d                                 c. goods

4) production  a                               d. imports

5) government b                       e. materials

6) protect f                               f. business

1.6 Дайте развернутые ответы на вопросы в письменной форме.

1) How were the mercantilists and the physiocrats different from each other?

Mercantilists argued that nations should behave as if they were merchants competing with one another for profit. Accordingly, governments should support industry by enacting laws designed to keep labor and other production costs low, and exports high. In this way the nation could achieve what was called a “favorable balance of trade”. The physiocrats argued that the products of agriculture and other natural resources were the true source of wealth. Since these were God-given, it made little sense for government to go out of its way to help business and industry increase profits. For similar reasons, they opposed government efforts to promote a “favorable balance of trade”.

2) Does the opinion about economic policies continue to be divided into two schools of thought similar to those described in the text?

Interestingly, the 200-year-old argument between those favoring regulation of the economy and those supporting “laissez faire” is still with us. Whether the problem involves individuals (like those living in poverty and unemployment) or institutions (such as a rising tide of business or bank failures), there are those who find the solution in government intervention, and others who favor “laissez faire” letting natural economic forces take their course. 

UNIT 2

Подберите правильный перевод к словам и фразам.

1) competitor (n)  i                      a. спрос

2) consumer (n)   g                      b. предложение

3) benefit (v)   e                      c. влиятельный

4) demand (n)  a                      d. эффективный

5) maximize (v)   f                     e. приносить пользу

6) interfere (v)   j                     f. увеличить до предела                                                                               

7) supply (n)    b                      g. потребитель

8) efficient (adj)  d                     h. факторы производства

9) influential (adj)   c                   i. конкурент

10) factors of production h        j. вмешиваться

 2.2 Прочитайте текст и найдите ответы на вопросы.  

1) With which group are A.Smith’s ideas most in agreement: the mercantilists or the physiocrats?

 Smith agreed with the physiocrates and their policy of “laissez faire”, letting individuals and businesses function without interference from government regulation or private monopolies. In that way, the “invisible hand” would be free to guide the economy and maximize production.

2) What is another term for Smith’s “invisible hand”?

The “invisible hand” was Smith’s name for the economic forces that we today would call supply and demand, or the marketplace.

3) When was The Wealth of Nationspublished?

The Wealth of Nations was published 1776 years.

4) What industry did Smith describe to demonstrate how the principle of the division of labor worked?

Smith turned to the pin industry to demonstrate how the division of labor and the use of machinery increased output.

ADAM SMITH AND THE WEALTH OF NATIONS

     1776, THE YEAR THAT Americans associate with the signing of the Declaration of Independence, also marked the publication in England of one of the most influential books of our time, The wealth of Nations. Written by Adam Smith, it earned the author the title “The father of economics”.

     Smith objected to the principal economic beliefs of his day. He differed with the physiocrats who argued that land was the only source of wealth. He also disagreed with the mercantilists who measured the wealth of a nation by its money supply, and who called for government regulation of the economy in order to promote a “favorable balance of trade”.    

In Smith’s view, a nation’s wealth was dependent upon production, not agriculture alone. How much it produced, he believed, depended upon how well it combined labor and the other factors of production. The more efficient the combination, the greater the output, and the greater the nation’s wealth.

     The heart of Smith’s economic philosophy was his belief that the economy would work best if left to function on its own without government regulation. In those circumstances, self-interest would lead business firms to produce only those products that consumers wanted, and to produce them at the lowest possible cost. They would do this, not as a means of benefiting society, but in an effort to outperform their competitors and gain the greatest profit. But all this self-interest would benefit society as a whole by providing it with more and better goods and services, at the lowest prices.

      To explain why all society benefits when economy is free of regulation, Smith used the metaphor of the “invisible hand”. The “invisible hand” was Smith’s name for the economic forces that we today would call supply and demand, or the marketplace. He sharply disagreed with the mercantilists who, in their quest for a “favorable balance of trade”, called for regulation of the economy. Instead, Smith agreed with the physiocrates and their policy of “laissez faire”, letting individuals and businesses function without interference from government regulation or private monopolies. In that way, the “invisible hand” would be free to guide the economy and maximize production.

     The Wealth of Nations goes on to describe the principal elements of the economic system. Smith turned to the pin industry to demonstrate how the division of labor and the use of machinery increased output.

     “One man draws out the wire, another straights it, a third cuts it, a fourth points it, a fifth grinds it at the top for receiving the head; to make the head requires two or three distinct operations …”.

     Although modern technology has improved the methods by which pins are produced, the principles pertaining to the division of labor remain unchanged.

     Similarly, other sections dealing with the factors of production, money and international trade are as meaningful today as when they were first written. Smith’s The Wealth of Nations contains some of the best descriptions of the principles upon which the economic system of the United States is based.

ПЕРЕВОД!